[#6363] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

17 messages 2000/11/14
[#6367] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/11/14

Hello again --

[#6582] best way to interleaf arrays? — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

15 messages 2000/11/26

[#6646] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Ross asked something about widely known and largely ignored language (on

23 messages 2000/11/29
[#6652] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — rpmohn@... (Ross Mohn) 2000/11/29

aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com (Aleksi Niemel) wrote in

[#6723] Re: Array Intersect (&) question — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2000/12/01

> >Use a hash. Here's code to do both and more. It assumes that

[#6656] printing/accessing arrays and hashes — raja@... (Raja S.)

I'm coming to Ruby with a Python & Common Lisp background.

24 messages 2000/11/30

[ruby-talk:6612] Re: best way to interleaf arrays?

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
Date: 2000-11-29 02:38:02 UTC
List: ruby-talk #6612
David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

>    class Array 
>      def to_h
>        h = {}
>        each_index { |i| h[i] = at i }
>        h
>      end
>    end
> 
>    %w{ list of words }.to_h  # => {0=>"list", 1=>"of", 2=>"words"}
> 
> One could then invert the hash to get at least one version of the
> original effect -- namely, the original array elements as hash keys
> and all the values true.  (Even zero!)

I'm convinced by this, particular if we added the block form too.

Regards


Dave

In This Thread