[#6363] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

17 messages 2000/11/14
[#6367] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/11/14

Hello again --

[#6582] best way to interleaf arrays? — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

15 messages 2000/11/26

[#6646] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Ross asked something about widely known and largely ignored language (on

23 messages 2000/11/29
[#6652] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — rpmohn@... (Ross Mohn) 2000/11/29

aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com (Aleksi Niemel) wrote in

[#6723] Re: Array Intersect (&) question — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2000/12/01

> >Use a hash. Here's code to do both and more. It assumes that

[#6656] printing/accessing arrays and hashes — raja@... (Raja S.)

I'm coming to Ruby with a Python & Common Lisp background.

24 messages 2000/11/30

[ruby-talk:6556] Re: Note on docs for Array#reverse!

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2000-11-23 16:30:43 UTC
List: ruby-talk #6556
Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:6550] Note on docs for Array#reverse!"
    on 00/11/23, Robert Feldt <feldt@ce.chalmers.se> writes:
|
|"..., returning nil if arr is unchanged."
|
|does not fully describe the behavior

For reverse! behavior, `unchanged' means array size is either 0 or 1,
and that's all.  Neither I nor Ruby check for array contents.  It
costs a lot.

							matz.

In This Thread