[#6363] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

17 messages 2000/11/14
[#6367] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/11/14

Hello again --

[#6582] best way to interleaf arrays? — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

15 messages 2000/11/26

[#6646] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Ross asked something about widely known and largely ignored language (on

23 messages 2000/11/29
[#6652] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — rpmohn@... (Ross Mohn) 2000/11/29

aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com (Aleksi Niemel) wrote in

[#6723] Re: Array Intersect (&) question — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2000/12/01

> >Use a hash. Here's code to do both and more. It assumes that

[#6656] printing/accessing arrays and hashes — raja@... (Raja S.)

I'm coming to Ruby with a Python & Common Lisp background.

24 messages 2000/11/30

[ruby-talk:6334] Re: dup vs clone

From: jweirich@...
Date: 2000-11-14 02:04:32 UTC
List: ruby-talk #6334
>>>>> "Dave" == Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> writes:

    >> 4) What about reloading source files?  [...]
    >> How can I detect deleted methods?

    Dave> You could hook Module.remove_method and .undef_method.

Oops.  I wasn't clear.  I was thinking out load about the problems of
detecting methods deleted from source files.  Reloading the source
file will leave the original method definition unmodified.

    Dave> I'd personally like to see more browser support in 1.7,

Agreed.  We just need to figure out what we need.

-- 
-- Jim Weirich     jweirich@one.net    http://w3.one.net/~jweirich
---------------------------------------------------------------------
"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, 
not tried it." -- Donald Knuth (in a memo to Peter van Emde Boas)

In This Thread

Prev Next