[#6363] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

17 messages 2000/11/14
[#6367] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/11/14

Hello again --

[#6582] best way to interleaf arrays? — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

15 messages 2000/11/26

[#6646] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Ross asked something about widely known and largely ignored language (on

23 messages 2000/11/29
[#6652] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — rpmohn@... (Ross Mohn) 2000/11/29

aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com (Aleksi Niemel) wrote in

[#6723] Re: Array Intersect (&) question — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2000/12/01

> >Use a hash. Here's code to do both and more. It assumes that

[#6656] printing/accessing arrays and hashes — raja@... (Raja S.)

I'm coming to Ruby with a Python & Common Lisp background.

24 messages 2000/11/30

[ruby-talk:6412] clas << a & Pascal's with <record> do...end

From: Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Date: 2000-11-17 12:49:57 UTC
List: ruby-talk #6412
I was thinking that when a lot of work must be done on an object
it would be nice to alter the search path for methods without a 
receiver.

   a.do_this
   a.do_that
   a.do_the_other

could be perhaps written as:

   with a do 
      do_this
      do_that
      do_the_other
   end

However I realised you get this, pretty well, with:

   class << a
      def work_hard
         do_this
         do_that
         do_the_other
      end
   end

   a.work_hard

so I wouldn't need such a construct.  However, if I do this for many 
objects, I end up creating lots of singleton classes, that have no name.
So, to be really dynamic about this, I need to be able to destroy them
as well as create them.  Since they have no name, how can I do that?

	Hugh
	hgs@dmu.ac.uk


In This Thread

Prev Next