[#6363] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

17 messages 2000/11/14
[#6367] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/11/14

Hello again --

[#6582] best way to interleaf arrays? — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

15 messages 2000/11/26

[#6646] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Ross asked something about widely known and largely ignored language (on

23 messages 2000/11/29
[#6652] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — rpmohn@... (Ross Mohn) 2000/11/29

aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com (Aleksi Niemel) wrote in

[#6723] Re: Array Intersect (&) question — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2000/12/01

> >Use a hash. Here's code to do both and more. It assumes that

[#6656] printing/accessing arrays and hashes — raja@... (Raja S.)

I'm coming to Ruby with a Python & Common Lisp background.

24 messages 2000/11/30

[ruby-talk:6475] Re: Dr. Dobb's Python-URL! ... (Nov 20) ... "Ruby and Python" thread

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2000-11-20 23:16:28 UTC
List: ruby-talk #6475
Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:6473] Dr. Dobb's Python-URL! ... (Nov 20) ... "Ruby and Python" thread"
    on 00/11/21, "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@us.ibm.com> writes:

|> One odd thing I came across: while in Ruby apparently everything is an
|> instance (no difference between types and classes) I read somewhere that
|> functions and methods are _not_ first class citizens.
|
|Is this (literally) correct, or is this correct subject to some important 
|but unstated qualifications? And if so, was there a good (for some 
|purposes) trade-off involved? 

It used to be correct.
Methods became first class citizens on Mar. 3 1998.

In Ruby, unlike Python, method invocation does not generate method
object internally.

							matz.

In This Thread

Prev Next