[#6363] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

17 messages 2000/11/14
[#6367] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/11/14

Hello again --

[#6582] best way to interleaf arrays? — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

15 messages 2000/11/26

[#6646] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Ross asked something about widely known and largely ignored language (on

23 messages 2000/11/29
[#6652] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — rpmohn@... (Ross Mohn) 2000/11/29

aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com (Aleksi Niemel) wrote in

[#6723] Re: Array Intersect (&) question — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2000/12/01

> >Use a hash. Here's code to do both and more. It assumes that

[#6656] printing/accessing arrays and hashes — raja@... (Raja S.)

I'm coming to Ruby with a Python & Common Lisp background.

24 messages 2000/11/30

[ruby-talk:6561] Relational operators in Ruby.

From: Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Date: 2000-11-23 19:23:50 UTC
List: ruby-talk #6561
I have been thinking about relational operators in Ruby, (which is 
why I have ben messing about with alias_method and so on!) and I 
have written a small page explaining my thoughts on this.

http://www.eng.cse.dmu.ac.uk/~hgs/ruby/comparisons.html

It might be quite a big step to take, but I think it has some power.
I would be interested to know what people think, even if it is negative.
I don't think the results are too surprising, becuase the hehaviour
would be unchnaged in normal use.

	Hugh
	hgs@dmu.ac.uk


In This Thread

Prev Next