[#6363] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

17 messages 2000/11/14
[#6367] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/11/14

Hello again --

[#6582] best way to interleaf arrays? — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

15 messages 2000/11/26

[#6646] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Ross asked something about widely known and largely ignored language (on

23 messages 2000/11/29
[#6652] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — rpmohn@... (Ross Mohn) 2000/11/29

aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com (Aleksi Niemel) wrote in

[#6723] Re: Array Intersect (&) question — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2000/12/01

> >Use a hash. Here's code to do both and more. It assumes that

[#6656] printing/accessing arrays and hashes — raja@... (Raja S.)

I'm coming to Ruby with a Python & Common Lisp background.

24 messages 2000/11/30

[ruby-talk:6599] Re: Question on sort!

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2000-11-28 05:51:29 UTC
List: ruby-talk #6599
Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:6597] Question on sort!"
    on 00/11/28, Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> writes:

|Someone asked about a strange inconsistency in Rubicon, and I didn't
|know the answer. In light of the recent reverse! thread, I thought I'd 
|post it here:
|
|   [ 1, 2, 3 ].sort!		# => [1, 2, 3]
|   [ 1, 2 ].sort!		# => [1, 2]
|   [ 1 ].sort!                  # => nil
|   [  ].sort!                   # => nil
|
|This seems strange.

This is very preliminary behavior following
a-bang-method-returns-nil-if-it-does-not-modify-the-recevier
principle.  The behavior shall be more thorough in the future.

							matz.

In This Thread