[#6363] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

17 messages 2000/11/14
[#6367] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/11/14

Hello again --

[#6582] best way to interleaf arrays? — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

15 messages 2000/11/26

[#6646] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Ross asked something about widely known and largely ignored language (on

23 messages 2000/11/29
[#6652] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — rpmohn@... (Ross Mohn) 2000/11/29

aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com (Aleksi Niemel) wrote in

[#6723] Re: Array Intersect (&) question — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2000/12/01

> >Use a hash. Here's code to do both and more. It assumes that

[#6656] printing/accessing arrays and hashes — raja@... (Raja S.)

I'm coming to Ruby with a Python & Common Lisp background.

24 messages 2000/11/30

[ruby-talk:6212] Re: marshal.dump again

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2000-11-09 14:45:44 UTC
List: ruby-talk #6212
Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:6208] Re: marshal.dump again"
    on 00/11/09, Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> writes:

|>  With a negative limit (the default) it dump the whole object.
|> 
|Hmmm, The Book says its 100.

You've found the second (?) bug in the Dave&Andy's book.

I've pretty impressed that even they can make mistake.
Me?  the first print of my book contain hundreds of bugs.
A year ago, finding bugs in my book was pretty popular game among Japanese.

sigh.
							matz.

In This Thread