[#6363] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

17 messages 2000/11/14
[#6367] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/11/14

Hello again --

[#6582] best way to interleaf arrays? — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

15 messages 2000/11/26

[#6646] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Ross asked something about widely known and largely ignored language (on

23 messages 2000/11/29
[#6652] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — rpmohn@... (Ross Mohn) 2000/11/29

aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com (Aleksi Niemel) wrote in

[#6723] Re: Array Intersect (&) question — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2000/12/01

> >Use a hash. Here's code to do both and more. It assumes that

[#6656] printing/accessing arrays and hashes — raja@... (Raja S.)

I'm coming to Ruby with a Python & Common Lisp background.

24 messages 2000/11/30

[ruby-talk:6241] Re: Regular expression puzzle: user error or bug?

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2000-11-10 05:28:23 UTC
List: ruby-talk #6241
Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:6238] Regular expression puzzle: user error or bug?"
    on 00/11/10, "Conrad Schneiker/Austin/Contr/IBM" <schneik@us.ibm.com> writes:

|==== Case 3 ====
|./parse_path.rb:18:in `match': Stack overflow in regexp matcher: 
|/^(.*\/)*(((?:[^.\/]|[.](?=[^.\/]*[.]))*)([.][^.\/]*)*)$/ (RegexpError)
|        from ./parse_path.rb:18
|==========================================
|
|using ruby 1.6.2 (2000-10-12) [rs6000-aix4.3.2.0].
|
|However this doesn't fail for ruby 1.6.1 (2000-10-05) [i386-cygwin].

This worked fine for ruby 1.6.2 (2000-11-08) [i586-linux].
Case 3 consumes stack little bit further (294 against 224), but far
smaller than stack max (32767).

I don't know what is happening there.

							matz.

In This Thread