[#6363] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

17 messages 2000/11/14
[#6367] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/11/14

Hello again --

[#6582] best way to interleaf arrays? — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

15 messages 2000/11/26

[#6646] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Ross asked something about widely known and largely ignored language (on

23 messages 2000/11/29
[#6652] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — rpmohn@... (Ross Mohn) 2000/11/29

aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com (Aleksi Niemel) wrote in

[#6723] Re: Array Intersect (&) question — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2000/12/01

> >Use a hash. Here's code to do both and more. It assumes that

[#6656] printing/accessing arrays and hashes — raja@... (Raja S.)

I'm coming to Ruby with a Python & Common Lisp background.

24 messages 2000/11/30

[ruby-talk:6658] Re: printing/accessing arrays and hashes

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
Date: 2000-11-30 01:21:36 UTC
List: ruby-talk #6658
raja@cs.indiana.edu (Raja S.) writes:

> 1.  is there a builtin way to print an array so that it looks like an array?
>     a=[1,2,3,4]
>     print??? a        # should print [1,2,3,4]

#inspect returns a String representation of the array or hash

     a = [1,2,3,4]
     a.inspect		# => [1, 2, 3, 4]
     h = { 1 => "one", 2 => "two", 3 => "three" }
     h.inspect		# => {1=>"one", 2=>"two", 3=>"three"}


> 2.  Much to my surpise array (or hash) access with an invalid index
>     (or key)

      hash#fetch raises IndexError, but Array methods are more forgiving.

>     But on the occasion when direct element access is needed what is
>     the idiomatic way of avoiding out of bound errors in arrays
>     (equivalently in hashes)?  (Doing apriori index/key validation
>     checks? ... seems way too cumbersome ...)

I'm not sure there is one for Arrays, but you can always fix
that. You could, for example, extend the built-in [] and []= methods
for arrays to check their indices. However, that might well break
existing library code.

Sorry

Dave

In This Thread