[#6363] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

17 messages 2000/11/14
[#6367] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/11/14

Hello again --

[#6582] best way to interleaf arrays? — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

15 messages 2000/11/26

[#6646] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Ross asked something about widely known and largely ignored language (on

23 messages 2000/11/29
[#6652] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — rpmohn@... (Ross Mohn) 2000/11/29

aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com (Aleksi Niemel) wrote in

[#6723] Re: Array Intersect (&) question — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2000/12/01

> >Use a hash. Here's code to do both and more. It assumes that

[#6656] printing/accessing arrays and hashes — raja@... (Raja S.)

I'm coming to Ruby with a Python & Common Lisp background.

24 messages 2000/11/30

[ruby-talk:6317] Re: Q: Sandbox security, SAFE and system

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
Date: 2000-11-13 17:14:57 UTC
List: ruby-talk #6317
Robert Feldt <feldt@ce.chalmers.se> writes:

> I'm trying to understand SAFe and tainting in Ruby but I can't see how it
> can help me create a "sandbox" for constrained execution of scripts and
> apps not in my direct control. I would like to limit the files a script
> (and any processes it might spawn/fork etc.) can access and write to a
> specified sub-directory, but I guess it's out of reach for Ruby's tainting
> and SAFE model?

If you're on a Unix box, could you use Dir.chroot?


Dave

In This Thread