[#6363] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

17 messages 2000/11/14
[#6367] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/11/14

Hello again --

[#6582] best way to interleaf arrays? — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

15 messages 2000/11/26

[#6646] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Ross asked something about widely known and largely ignored language (on

23 messages 2000/11/29
[#6652] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — rpmohn@... (Ross Mohn) 2000/11/29

aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com (Aleksi Niemel) wrote in

[#6723] Re: Array Intersect (&) question — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2000/12/01

> >Use a hash. Here's code to do both and more. It assumes that

[#6656] printing/accessing arrays and hashes — raja@... (Raja S.)

I'm coming to Ruby with a Python & Common Lisp background.

24 messages 2000/11/30

[ruby-talk:6327] Re: What would a Ruby browser look like?

From: "Conrad Schneiker/Austin/Contr/IBM" <schneik@...>
Date: 2000-11-14 00:10:49 UTC
List: ruby-talk #6327
Charles Hixson writes:

# I really prefer avoiding underscores in names.  Internal capitalization
# provides all the break needed for easy reading, and many auxiliary 
programs
# split the parts of an underscored name separately.

Well, with one exception, Aleksi has already pretty much expressed my 
comments on this. (And I guess I haven't encountered the sorts of 
auxiliary programs that you mention.)

The one exception is probably very much a matter of personal aesthetics: I 
very strongly prefer underscores for easy readability. To me the 
alternative looks like a hard-to-read, crunched together kludge, and the 
secondary words look incorrectly capitalized, and I find it much easier to 
type one shift character repeatedly (i.e. "_") than random shifted 
letters. 

All I can say is that I find it interesting and puzzling that apparently 
many other people apparently don't agree (but I have no idea of what % of 
Ruby users care one way or another, if at all). If it weren't for the 
already fairly common use of "_" in Ruby already (and if Matz didn't care 
one way or the other), I would otherwise simply suggest voting on this, 
and go along with the result.

Conrad Schneiker
(This note is unofficial and subject to improvement without notice.)

In This Thread

Prev Next