[#6363] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

17 messages 2000/11/14
[#6367] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/11/14

Hello again --

[#6582] best way to interleaf arrays? — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

15 messages 2000/11/26

[#6646] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Ross asked something about widely known and largely ignored language (on

23 messages 2000/11/29
[#6652] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — rpmohn@... (Ross Mohn) 2000/11/29

aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com (Aleksi Niemel) wrote in

[#6723] Re: Array Intersect (&) question — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2000/12/01

> >Use a hash. Here's code to do both and more. It assumes that

[#6656] printing/accessing arrays and hashes — raja@... (Raja S.)

I'm coming to Ruby with a Python & Common Lisp background.

24 messages 2000/11/30

[ruby-talk:6591] Re: Q: refering to a Proc from class_eval

From: hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>
Date: 2000-11-27 16:04:23 UTC
List: ruby-talk #6591
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000  00:45:37 +0900, Aleksi Niemelwrote:
> > I'm trying to wrap function definitions, and cannot find a way to
> > refer to a block from inside the code I generate and subsequently pass
> > to class_eval:
> 
> Try this, it barks at me :).

Great, thanks! Maybe some more name mangling to prevent inter-object
name clashes and this is it (I'm trying to create statically typed
vars and methods, jus'fer hack-value :)

> > Something completely different: the manual claims that the construct
> > <<-EOF strips all leading whitespace from the here document. It
> > doesn't... (ruby 1.6.1 (2000-09-27) [i686-linux])
> 
> Um.. I'd guess the manual is just misleading. The Book says at page 204-205:
> 
>   You can put a minus sign immediately after the << characters, 
>   in which case the terminator can be indented from the left margin.
> 
> So if I'm not mistaken, it does not give a hint <<-HEREDOC_WITH_MINUS would
> modify the heredoced string in any way. If I recall correctly, there was
> some discussions about autostripping or indentation or something else
> previously at ruby-talk. So please, check the archives for that.

Got it.

	thanks,
	Michel

In This Thread