[#6363] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

17 messages 2000/11/14
[#6367] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/11/14

Hello again --

[#6582] best way to interleaf arrays? — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

15 messages 2000/11/26

[#6646] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Ross asked something about widely known and largely ignored language (on

23 messages 2000/11/29
[#6652] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — rpmohn@... (Ross Mohn) 2000/11/29

aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com (Aleksi Niemel) wrote in

[#6723] Re: Array Intersect (&) question — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2000/12/01

> >Use a hash. Here's code to do both and more. It assumes that

[#6656] printing/accessing arrays and hashes — raja@... (Raja S.)

I'm coming to Ruby with a Python & Common Lisp background.

24 messages 2000/11/30

[ruby-talk:6355] Re: Another Smalltalk control structure idea

From: Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Date: 2000-11-14 10:36:21 UTC
List: ruby-talk #6355
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, hipster wrote:

> On Tue, 14 Nov 2000  15:29:31 +0900, Conrad Schneiker/Austin/Contr/IBM wrote:
> [snip] 
	[...]
> > Hmm. What's this here? Your might want to consider "reduce: a generalized 
> > inject function" (http://www.xs4all.nl/~hipster/lib/ruby/reduce) as a 
> > starting point. It's already written in Ruby. (What a coincidence! :-) And 
> > it happens to have the name I prefer.
> 
> Credits go to Dave Thomas, see [ruby-talk:03178]. I merely archived
> it for posterity.

Is it any help to remind people that Python has
    map
    filter
    reduce
which operate on lists?  See:
http://www.python.org/doc/current/lib/built-in-funcs.html
for what they do.

I noticed from the Ruby Central library reference:
http://www.rubycentral.com/ref/index.html
that Ruby has map! but doesn't seem to have map.  It doesn't have
filter or reduce either.

> 
> Regarding the camelCase vs. underscore discussion, I'd like to express
> my preference for underscores.
> 
I'd agree, but could live with the other.
> 	Michel
> 
	Hugh


In This Thread