[#6363] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

17 messages 2000/11/14
[#6367] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/11/14

Hello again --

[#6582] best way to interleaf arrays? — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

15 messages 2000/11/26

[#6646] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Ross asked something about widely known and largely ignored language (on

23 messages 2000/11/29
[#6652] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — rpmohn@... (Ross Mohn) 2000/11/29

aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com (Aleksi Niemel) wrote in

[#6723] Re: Array Intersect (&) question — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2000/12/01

> >Use a hash. Here's code to do both and more. It assumes that

[#6656] printing/accessing arrays and hashes — raja@... (Raja S.)

I'm coming to Ruby with a Python & Common Lisp background.

24 messages 2000/11/30

[ruby-talk:6499] Re: ANN: BitVector 0.1.5

From: Robert Feldt <feldt@...>
Date: 2000-11-21 13:41:29 UTC
List: ruby-talk #6499
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Conrad Schneiker wrote:

> now it's my turn.  In particular, for readability, could this:
> 
> # b = BitVector.new(100000).randomize      # 1e5 random bits
> # a = BitVector.new(100000).randomize      # another 1e5 random bits
> 
> be replaced by this:
> 
> b = BitVector.new(100_000).randomize      # 1e5 random bits
> a = BitVector.new(100_000).randomize      # another 1e5 random bits
> 
Fixed in next release... :-)

> since ruby -e 'print 100_000, "\n"' produces 100000?
> 
I didn't know this; thanks.

/Robert


In This Thread

Prev Next