[#13775] Problems with racc rule definitions — Michael Neumann <neumann@...>

15 messages 2001/04/17
[#13795] Re: Problems with racc rule definitions — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2001/04/18

Hi,

[#13940] From Guido, with love... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

52 messages 2001/04/20

[#13953] regexp — James Ponder <james@...>

Hi, I'm new to ruby and am coming from a perl background - therefore I

19 messages 2001/04/21

[#14033] Distributed Ruby and heterogeneous networks — harryo@... (Harry Ohlsen)

I wrote my first small distributed application yesterday and it worked

15 messages 2001/04/22

[#14040] RCR: getClassFromString method — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)

It would be nice to have a function that returns a class type given a

20 messages 2001/04/22

[#14130] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Guy N. Hurst wrote:

21 messages 2001/04/24
[#14148] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — Stephen White <spwhite@...> 2001/04/24

On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Conrad Schneiker wrote:

[#14188] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/04/25

Hi,

[#14193] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — "W. Kent Starr" <elderburn@...> 2001/04/25

On Tuesday 24 April 2001 23:02, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#14138] Re: python on the smalltalk VM — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>

FYI: Thought this might be of interest to the JRuby and Ruby/GUI folks.

27 messages 2001/04/24
[#14153] Re: python on the smalltalk VM — Andrew Kuchling <akuchlin@...> 2001/04/24

Conrad Schneiker <schneik@austin.ibm.com> writes:

[#14154] array#flatten! question — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/04/24

Hello.

[#14159] Can I insert into an array — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/04/24

Ok, this may be a dumb question, but, is it possible to insert into an

[#14162] Re: Can I insert into an array — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2001/04/24

Jim Freeze <jim@freeze.org> writes:

[#14289] RCR: Array#insert — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2001/04/27

At Wed, 25 Apr 2001 01:28:36 +0900,

[#14221] An or in an if. — Tim Pettman <tjp@...>

Hi there,

18 messages 2001/04/25

[#14267] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Danny van Bruggen,

16 messages 2001/04/26

[#14452] How to do it the Ruby-way 3 — Stefan Matthias Aust <sma@3plus4.de>

First a question: Why is

21 messages 2001/04/30

[ruby-talk:13465] Re: A subtle Hash bug

From: Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
Date: 2001-04-03 18:52:06 UTC
List: ruby-talk #13465
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Christoph Rippel wrote:
> > Is there any good reason why Float's "Infinity" value is equal to itself?
> > And then, is there any good reason why it shouldn't be changed?
> Well,
> the outcome of floating point division of 1 by +/-0.0 is either 
> Infinity or -Infinity and that they are different that just a 
> reflection of standard C double behavior. Not you can use 
> +/- Infinity as regular input and gets something sensible like
> p Math.atan(1/-1.0)  # => -0.7853981634  a.k.a -Pi/4
> p Math.atan(1/1.0)   # => 0.7853981634
> so +/-Infinities have to be different. The 

I'm not proposing that +Infinity should be indistinguishable from
-Infinity. I'm asking why is +Infinity == +Infinity and -Infinity ==
-Infinity.

> hack is hardware independent and should work on all platforms. 
> The exception raising behavior of zero-division and comparison
> is type specific on the method receiver end
>  2**29 <=> 1/0.0  # => -1 since  2**29 is a Fixnum   
>  2**33 <=> 1/0.0  # FloatDomainError: Infinity since 2**33 is Bignum

this should return -1 since although +Infinity is not a precise number, it
is greater than all other finite values and -Infinity. (it is however
noncomparable to itself and to NaN)

>  1/ 0             # a ZeroDivisionError is raised for any Integer type

This is ok, because the Integer domain has no equivalent of Infinities and
NaNs.

> I actually have a Ruby hack of logical +/- Infinity's constants.
> The semantics is closer to +/- nil and but you can perform limited
> Arithmetic on them - I made them instances of +/- Infinity Classes
> sub-typed from Numeric but this is not really necessary. (the are
> necessarily smaller/bigger then floats infinities).

May I see that? Btw, what are +nil and -nil ???

> methods input of any numeric object (except for Rational, which
> is an eager beaver and tries to process input it does not 
> understand instead of calling coerce).

Do you think Rational should be fixed to act, ehm, more rationally?

matju

In This Thread