[#4766] Wiki — "Glen Stampoultzis" <trinexus@...>

21 messages 2000/09/04
[#4768] RE: Wiki — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2000/09/04

Hi, Glen,

[#4783] Re: Wiki — Masatoshi SEKI <m_seki@...> 2000/09/04

[#4785] Re: Wiki — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2000/09/05

Howdy,

[#4883] Re-binding a block — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

16 messages 2000/09/12

[#4930] Perl 6 rumblings -- RFC 225 (v1) Data: Superpositions — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>

Hi,

11 messages 2000/09/15

[#4936] Ruby Book Eng. translation editor's questions — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

20 messages 2000/09/16

[#5045] Proposal: Add constants to Math — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

15 messages 2000/09/21

[#5077] Crazy idea? infix method calls — hal9000@...

This is a generalization of the "in" operator idea which I

17 messages 2000/09/22

[#5157] Compile Problem with 1.6.1 — Scott Billings <aerogems@...>

When I try to compile Ruby 1.6.1, I get the following error:

15 messages 2000/09/27

[ruby-talk:5132] Re: Ruby Book, Eng. tl, kei/kata and shurui -> 'type'?

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2000-09-26 07:20:13 UTC
List: ruby-talk #5132
Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:5112] Ruby Book, Eng. tl,  kei/kata and shurui -> 'type'?"
    on 00/09/26, Jon Babcock <jon@kanji.com> writes:

|Would it be correct to write オブジェクトの型 (obujekuto no kei/kata)
|here?  Would that change the meaning? (Of course this is not a
|suggestion. Just a question.)

'オブジェクトの型 (object no kata)' reminds me the dynamic type of an
instance, which is a class.  The items in the table is not classes,
but kind of object structures.  Every object has its dynamic type
(class) and structure.  So that the title of the table might be 'Types
(or Kinds) of Object Structure'.

							matz.

In This Thread

Prev Next