[#4766] Wiki — "Glen Stampoultzis" <trinexus@...>

21 messages 2000/09/04
[#4768] RE: Wiki — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2000/09/04

Hi, Glen,

[#4783] Re: Wiki — Masatoshi SEKI <m_seki@...> 2000/09/04

[#4785] Re: Wiki — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2000/09/05

Howdy,

[#4883] Re-binding a block — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

16 messages 2000/09/12

[#4930] Perl 6 rumblings -- RFC 225 (v1) Data: Superpositions — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>

Hi,

11 messages 2000/09/15

[#4936] Ruby Book Eng. translation editor's questions — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

20 messages 2000/09/16

[#5045] Proposal: Add constants to Math — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

15 messages 2000/09/21

[#5077] Crazy idea? infix method calls — hal9000@...

This is a generalization of the "in" operator idea which I

17 messages 2000/09/22

[#5157] Compile Problem with 1.6.1 — Scott Billings <aerogems@...>

When I try to compile Ruby 1.6.1, I get the following error:

15 messages 2000/09/27

[ruby-talk:4989] Re: Ruby Book Ch 2 English -- arguments/parameters/options?

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2000-09-18 14:57:12 UTC
List: ruby-talk #4989
Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:4987] Ruby Book Ch 2 English -- arguments/parameters/options?"
    on 00/09/18, Jon Babcock <jon@kanji.com> writes:
|
|But in the Ruby Book translation of Ch2., 引数 (J. insuu) is nearly
|always rendered as 'parameter/s'. 

I read 引数 as (hiki-suu), but either OK in Japanese.

IIRC, original chapter 2 uses the word `parameters' 4 times, always in
conjunction with blocks.  I call something between bars (||) as `block
parameters'.

Everything else should be arguments, I think.  Almost all of these are
actual arguments.  For formal arguments, the word 仮引数
(J. kari-hikisuu) is used.

|io.print(...)          引数を順に出力
|
|Should the explanation read, "Output the parameters sequentially." or
|"Output the arguments sequentially."  Or does it matter?

It doesn't matter.  But I prefer the word arguments.

							matz.

In This Thread