[#4766] Wiki — "Glen Stampoultzis" <trinexus@...>

21 messages 2000/09/04
[#4768] RE: Wiki — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2000/09/04

Hi, Glen,

[#4783] Re: Wiki — Masatoshi SEKI <m_seki@...> 2000/09/04

[#4785] Re: Wiki — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2000/09/05

Howdy,

[#4883] Re-binding a block — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

16 messages 2000/09/12

[#4930] Perl 6 rumblings -- RFC 225 (v1) Data: Superpositions — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>

Hi,

11 messages 2000/09/15

[#4936] Ruby Book Eng. translation editor's questions — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

20 messages 2000/09/16

[#5045] Proposal: Add constants to Math — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

15 messages 2000/09/21

[#5077] Crazy idea? infix method calls — hal9000@...

This is a generalization of the "in" operator idea which I

17 messages 2000/09/22

[#5157] Compile Problem with 1.6.1 — Scott Billings <aerogems@...>

When I try to compile Ruby 1.6.1, I get the following error:

15 messages 2000/09/27

[ruby-talk:4907] Re: Re-binding a block

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
Date: 2000-09-12 16:50:01 UTC
List: ruby-talk #4907
Yasushi Shoji <yashi@yashi.com> writes:

> ps. Dave, are you tring to create anonymous method so that you can use
> it in hooked method *and* it can't be messed by whomever sub-classes it?

What I'm hoping to produce is a standard way to hook Ruby methods
without the problems inherent in just using alias. The way I'm
currently playing with seems to work well with subclasses, and avoids
the loops that can result from using alias.

If I can get this basic functionality working, I hope to extend it to
be something more like the CL advice system.

It's also fun to see if it can be done purely in Ruby code.


Regards


Dave

In This Thread