[#4766] Wiki — "Glen Stampoultzis" <trinexus@...>

21 messages 2000/09/04
[#4768] RE: Wiki — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2000/09/04

Hi, Glen,

[#4783] Re: Wiki — Masatoshi SEKI <m_seki@...> 2000/09/04

[#4785] Re: Wiki — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2000/09/05

Howdy,

[#4883] Re-binding a block — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

16 messages 2000/09/12

[#4930] Perl 6 rumblings -- RFC 225 (v1) Data: Superpositions — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>

Hi,

11 messages 2000/09/15

[#4936] Ruby Book Eng. translation editor's questions — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

20 messages 2000/09/16

[#5045] Proposal: Add constants to Math — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

15 messages 2000/09/21

[#5077] Crazy idea? infix method calls — hal9000@...

This is a generalization of the "in" operator idea which I

17 messages 2000/09/22

[#5157] Compile Problem with 1.6.1 — Scott Billings <aerogems@...>

When I try to compile Ruby 1.6.1, I get the following error:

15 messages 2000/09/27

[ruby-talk:4968] Re: Ruby Book Eng. translation editor's questions

From: SUGIHARA Hiroshi (SuHi or SugHimsi) <manamist@...>
Date: 2000-09-17 21:22:10 UTC
List: ruby-talk #4968
| Japanese kakko includes both ( ) and { } and maybe [ ], 
| doesn't it? But I have the feeling that in English the use of
| 'parenthesis' or 'parentheses' is usually limited to only the ( and ).
| If this is true, } cannot be 'a case of' parenthesis.

That's true: I was a bad worker on this.

I agree to Brian's suggestion.

regards,

-- 
SugHimsi (SUGIHARA Hiroshi)
manamist@white.diamond.ne.jp

In This Thread