From: Jon Babcock Date: 2000-09-26T03:34:08+09:00 Subject: [ruby-talk:5112] Ruby Book, Eng. tl, kei/kata and shurui -> 'type'? Jon, the editor, here... Because 'type' is a technical term in programming languages, I try to avoid using 'type' where the technical meaning is not intended. In chapters 2, 4, and 10 (the chapters I've completed so far), I have tried to enforce this policy, using Eng. 'type' for 型 (kei/kata) and such words as 'kind', 'variety', 'category', plurals, etc., for 種類 (shurui). The Eng. tl of Table 8.1 is 'Types of Objects' for オブジェクトの種類 (obujekuto no shurui) Would it be correct to write オブジェクトの型 (obujekuto no kei/kata) here? Would that change the meaning? (Of course this is not a suggestion. Just a question.) OTOH, on the English side, would something like 'Kinds of Objects' be incorrect or misleading here? I'm inclined to leave the translation as 'Types of Objects' in this case. But input from experts would help me to clarify my 'editorial policy'. Table 8.1 goes on to list and explain things like T_OBJECT, T_TRUE, T_REGEXP, T_FIXNUM, T_SCOPE, T_NODE etc. Thanks. Jon PS Please correct my J. readings any time. I'm always interested in how these terms are pronunciated in the 'real' world. -- Jon Babcock