[#4734] Possible regex bug? — hal9000@...
OK, I'm trying to match an optional comma followed by
[#4744] Piping in Ruby? — Stephen White <steve@...>
There's one construct I miss from shell scripts... The ability to pipe the
[#4766] Wiki — "Glen Stampoultzis" <trinexus@...>
Hi, Glen,
Howdy,
> I asked him/her. He/She opened the new site using tiki-1.0.4.
Hi, Glen,
Howdy,
[#4769] unix 'time' in Ruby? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>
Hi.
[#4774] Module vs. Class — Jilani Khaldi <jilanik@...>
Hi,
[#4776] Listing methods in a module — DaVinci <bombadil@...>
Hi all. I need a little help :)
[#4792] closures — Stuart Zakon <zakons@...>
Can somebody please explain what a closure is within the context of
[#4809] Some questions — Friedrich Dominicus <frido@...>
[#4849] FEATURE REQUEST: Fixnum bitfields — Wayne Scott <wscott@...>
Hi,
[#4883] Re-binding a block — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#4916] Re: [TOY] FL — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>
> I still don't understand sorry.
[#4930] Perl 6 rumblings -- RFC 225 (v1) Data: Superpositions — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>
Hi,
[#4936] Ruby Book Eng. translation editor's questions — Jon Babcock <jon@...>
Nobody cares about this but me,
Thanks very much for the input.
SugHimsi.
,
[#4951] What do I need to compile 1.4? — "Glen Stampoultzis" <trinexus@...>
Platform is Windows 98
[#4987] Ruby Book Ch 2 English -- arguments/parameters/options? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>
Once again, I must impose on your good graces.
[#4992] Re: Perl 6 rumblings -- RFC 225 (v1) Data: S uperpositions (fwd) — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Michael dared to suggest, and was probably right:
[#5009] Re: Ruby Book Ch 2 English -- arguments/parameters/options? — "Dat Nguyen" <thucdat@...>
[#5011] Changes in 1.6.0 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Hi,
[#5013] A QuantumSuperposition Proposal for Ruby — Huayin Wang <wang@...>
# I have been play around the QuantumSuperpositions idea today and
[#5028] A Tru64 problem and ruby-talkietiquette — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
I just saw this (the little I could see in English)
[#5033] Having problems with Net::HTTP::do_finish — Dan Schmidt <dfan@...>
I just started using Ruby yesterday, and I'm having trouble with my
[#5045] Proposal: Add constants to Math — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>
Hi,
On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Masahiro Tanaka wrote:
>From: Robert Feldt <feldt@ce.chalmers.se>
[#5061] Proposal: Add rubycpp.h or include in ruby.h — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>
[#5070] Ruby Book 2.18, Eng.tl, kesaran pasaran? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>
From Ruby Book 2.18:
[#5077] Crazy idea? infix method calls — hal9000@...
This is a generalization of the "in" operator idea which I
[#5082] Application Error in 1.6.0 on Win2K — "Kevin Burge" <kcbspam@...>
I've created a 1.6.0 ruby extension (1.6.0 (2000-09-19) [i586-mswin32]),
[#5092] RE: Hanging require — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> ruby -v a.rb
[#5114] Types and === — hal9000@...
<sigh> I imagine Yoda behind me, shaking his little green head
[#5157] Compile Problem with 1.6.1 — Scott Billings <aerogems@...>
When I try to compile Ruby 1.6.1, I get the following error:
[#5161] Re: Types and === — schneik@...
[#5175] Compiling 1.6.1 problem — Tony Reed <Callus@...>
Compiling Ruby 1.6.1 fails:
Hi,
On 9/29/00, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
From: Tony Reed <Callus@Sympatico.CA>
[ruby-talk:5174] Re: Compile Problem with 1.6.1
Well, just to see what would happen, I changed the Athlon optimisations to PentiumPro optimisations, and it compiled fine. The make test still fails: [root@localhost ruby-1.6.1]# make test not ok float 9 -- /downloads/ruby-1.6.1/sample/test.rb:562 test failed make: *** [test] Error 1 (gdb) r ./sample/test.rb Starting program: /downloads/ruby-1.6.1/miniruby ./sample/test.rb warning: Unable to find dynamic linker breakpoint function. GDB will be unable to debug shared library initializers and track explicitly loaded dynamic code. assignment ok 1 ok 2 ok 3 ok 4 ok 5 ok 6 condition ok 1 ok 2 if/unless ok 1 ok 2 ok 3 case ok 1 ok 2 ok 3 ok 4 ok 5 while/until ok 1 ok 2 ok 3 ok 4 ok 5 ok 6 ok 7 ok 8 exception ok 1 ok 2 ok 3 ok 4 ok 5 ok 6 ok 7 array ok 1 ok 2 ok 3 ok 4 ok 5 ok 6 ok 7 ok 8 ok 9 ok 10 ok 11 ok 12 ok 13 ok 14 ok 15 ok 16 ok 17 ok 18 ok 19 ok 20 ok 21 ok 22 ok 23 ok 24 ok 25 ok 26 ok 27 ok 28 ok 29 ok 30 ok 31 ok 32 ok 33 ok 34 ok 35 ok 36 hash ok 1 ok 2 ok 3 ok 4 ok 5 ok 6 ok 7 ok 8 ok 9 ok 10 ok 11 ok 12 iterator ok 1 ok 2 ok 3 ok 4 ok 5 ok 6 ok 7 ok 8 ok 9 ok 10 ok 11 ok 12 ok 13 ok 14 ok 15 ok 16 ok 17 ok 18 ok 19 ok 20 ok 21 ok 22 ok 23 ok 24 ok 25 ok 26 ok 27 ok 28 ok 29 ok 30 ok 31 ok 32 ok 33 ok 34 float ok 1 ok 2 ok 3 ok 4 ok 5 ok 6 ok 7 ok 8 not ok float 9 -- ./sample/test.rb:562 bignum ok 1 ok 2 ok 3 ok 4 ok 5 ok 6 ok 7 ok 8 ok 9 ok 10 ok 11 ok 12 ok 13 ok 14 ok 15 ok 16 ok 17 ok 18 ok 19 ok 20 ok 21 ok 22 ok 23 string & char ok 1 ok 2 ok 3 ok 4 ok 5 ok 6 ok 7 ok 8 ok 9 ok 10 ok 11 ok 12 ok 13 ok 14 ok 15 ok 16 ok 17 ok 18 ok 19 ok 20 ok 21 ok 22 ok 23 ok 24 ok 25 ok 26 ok 27 ok 28 ok 29 ok 30 ok 31 ok 32 ok 33 ok 34 ok 35 ok 36 ok 37 ok 38 ok 39 ok 40 ok 41 ok 42 ok 43 ok 44 ok 45 ok 46 ok 47 ok 48 ok 49 ok 50 ok 51 ok 52 ok 53 ok 54 assignment ok 1 ok 2 ok 3 ok 4 ok 5 ok 6 ok 7 ok 8 ok 9 ok 10 call ok 1 ok 2 ok 3 ok 4 ok 5 ok 6 proc ok 1 ok 2 ok 3 ok 4 ok 5 ok 6 ok 7 signal Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt. 0x4008a091 in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6 (gdb) where #0 0x4008a091 in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6 #1 0x80a54cb in rb_f_kill () #2 0x8058f79 in call_cfunc () #3 0x80594b1 in rb_call0 () #4 0x8059bb4 in rb_call () #5 0x805514c in rb_eval () #6 0x8053b31 in rb_eval () #7 0x8053b31 in rb_eval () #8 0x80520b4 in ruby_run () #9 0x8050761 in main () #10 0x40083cae in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6 (gdb) But otherwise, so far it seems to be working (altho' I haven't had time to run more than a "Hello World" sort of app....... Of course, it might be a good idea to try and make Ruby compile successfully with AthlonGCC, in which case I'll volunteer to test various things/patches/etc.... -Scott- > |Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > |0x400bd5fe in free () from /lib/libc.so.6 > > This information strongly suggests that there're pointer bugs. But I > couldn't find any of them using checkergcc. sigh. > > matz.