[#4766] Wiki — "Glen Stampoultzis" <trinexus@...>

21 messages 2000/09/04
[#4768] RE: Wiki — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2000/09/04

Hi, Glen,

[#4783] Re: Wiki — Masatoshi SEKI <m_seki@...> 2000/09/04

[#4785] Re: Wiki — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2000/09/05

Howdy,

[#4883] Re-binding a block — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

16 messages 2000/09/12

[#4930] Perl 6 rumblings -- RFC 225 (v1) Data: Superpositions — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>

Hi,

11 messages 2000/09/15

[#4936] Ruby Book Eng. translation editor's questions — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

20 messages 2000/09/16

[#5045] Proposal: Add constants to Math — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

15 messages 2000/09/21

[#5077] Crazy idea? infix method calls — hal9000@...

This is a generalization of the "in" operator idea which I

17 messages 2000/09/22

[#5157] Compile Problem with 1.6.1 — Scott Billings <aerogems@...>

When I try to compile Ruby 1.6.1, I get the following error:

15 messages 2000/09/27

[ruby-talk:5019] Re: A QuantumSuperposition Proposal for Ruby

From: Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...>
Date: 2000-09-20 03:42:19 UTC
List: ruby-talk #5019
At Wed, 20 Sep 2000 11:10:28 +0900,
Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:
> 
> > one more thing.  IMHO, it's better to use Symbol rather than String
> > for @method.
> 
> Even better would be a closure or method object - that method call
> gets made in a loop, and it's about 10 times as expensive as invoking
> a method object.

it is indeed expensive than invoking a method object, but not as
expensive as you says.  at least not on my box.

on my box the ratio is about

invoking method object : regular method call : via method send
         1             :       1.1           :       1.5
--
         yashi

In This Thread