[#4766] Wiki — "Glen Stampoultzis" <trinexus@...>

21 messages 2000/09/04
[#4768] RE: Wiki — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2000/09/04

Hi, Glen,

[#4783] Re: Wiki — Masatoshi SEKI <m_seki@...> 2000/09/04

[#4785] Re: Wiki — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2000/09/05

Howdy,

[#4883] Re-binding a block — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

16 messages 2000/09/12

[#4930] Perl 6 rumblings -- RFC 225 (v1) Data: Superpositions — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>

Hi,

11 messages 2000/09/15

[#4936] Ruby Book Eng. translation editor's questions — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

20 messages 2000/09/16

[#5045] Proposal: Add constants to Math — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

15 messages 2000/09/21

[#5077] Crazy idea? infix method calls — hal9000@...

This is a generalization of the "in" operator idea which I

17 messages 2000/09/22

[#5157] Compile Problem with 1.6.1 — Scott Billings <aerogems@...>

When I try to compile Ruby 1.6.1, I get the following error:

15 messages 2000/09/27

[ruby-talk:4887] Re: Re-binding a block

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
Date: 2000-09-12 05:06:20 UTC
List: ruby-talk #4887
matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

>      class Matz
>        @@block = proc { puts @name }
>... 
>        def block
>          self.instance_eval(&@@block)
>        end
>      end

Now, say I wanted to make it more complicated and pass parameters in
to the block. Would it be reasonable to change instance_eval so that
if block_given? was true, any parameters given to instance_eval were
passed to the block? Or am I missing (yet another) clever trick?


Dave

In This Thread