[#4734] Possible regex bug? — hal9000@...
OK, I'm trying to match an optional comma followed by
[#4744] Piping in Ruby? — Stephen White <steve@...>
There's one construct I miss from shell scripts... The ability to pipe the
[#4766] Wiki — "Glen Stampoultzis" <trinexus@...>
Hi, Glen,
Howdy,
> I asked him/her. He/She opened the new site using tiki-1.0.4.
Hi, Glen,
Howdy,
[#4769] unix 'time' in Ruby? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>
Hi.
[#4774] Module vs. Class — Jilani Khaldi <jilanik@...>
Hi,
[#4776] Listing methods in a module — DaVinci <bombadil@...>
Hi all. I need a little help :)
[#4792] closures — Stuart Zakon <zakons@...>
Can somebody please explain what a closure is within the context of
[#4809] Some questions — Friedrich Dominicus <frido@...>
[#4849] FEATURE REQUEST: Fixnum bitfields — Wayne Scott <wscott@...>
Hi,
[#4883] Re-binding a block — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#4916] Re: [TOY] FL — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>
> I still don't understand sorry.
[#4930] Perl 6 rumblings -- RFC 225 (v1) Data: Superpositions — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>
Hi,
[#4936] Ruby Book Eng. translation editor's questions — Jon Babcock <jon@...>
Nobody cares about this but me,
Thanks very much for the input.
SugHimsi.
,
[#4951] What do I need to compile 1.4? — "Glen Stampoultzis" <trinexus@...>
Platform is Windows 98
[#4987] Ruby Book Ch 2 English -- arguments/parameters/options? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>
Once again, I must impose on your good graces.
[#4992] Re: Perl 6 rumblings -- RFC 225 (v1) Data: S uperpositions (fwd) — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Michael dared to suggest, and was probably right:
[#5009] Re: Ruby Book Ch 2 English -- arguments/parameters/options? — "Dat Nguyen" <thucdat@...>
[#5011] Changes in 1.6.0 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Hi,
[#5013] A QuantumSuperposition Proposal for Ruby — Huayin Wang <wang@...>
# I have been play around the QuantumSuperpositions idea today and
[#5028] A Tru64 problem and ruby-talkietiquette — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
I just saw this (the little I could see in English)
[#5033] Having problems with Net::HTTP::do_finish — Dan Schmidt <dfan@...>
I just started using Ruby yesterday, and I'm having trouble with my
[#5045] Proposal: Add constants to Math — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>
Hi,
On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Masahiro Tanaka wrote:
>From: Robert Feldt <feldt@ce.chalmers.se>
[#5061] Proposal: Add rubycpp.h or include in ruby.h — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>
[#5070] Ruby Book 2.18, Eng.tl, kesaran pasaran? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>
From Ruby Book 2.18:
[#5077] Crazy idea? infix method calls — hal9000@...
This is a generalization of the "in" operator idea which I
[#5082] Application Error in 1.6.0 on Win2K — "Kevin Burge" <kcbspam@...>
I've created a 1.6.0 ruby extension (1.6.0 (2000-09-19) [i586-mswin32]),
[#5092] RE: Hanging require — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> ruby -v a.rb
[#5114] Types and === — hal9000@...
<sigh> I imagine Yoda behind me, shaking his little green head
[#5157] Compile Problem with 1.6.1 — Scott Billings <aerogems@...>
When I try to compile Ruby 1.6.1, I get the following error:
[#5161] Re: Types and === — schneik@...
[#5175] Compiling 1.6.1 problem — Tony Reed <Callus@...>
Compiling Ruby 1.6.1 fails:
Hi,
On 9/29/00, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
From: Tony Reed <Callus@Sympatico.CA>
[ruby-talk:4795] Re: closures
At Wed, 6 Sep 2000 00:29:21 +0900,
Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:
> > Can somebody please explain what a closure is within the context of
> > Ruby? (Simple explanation, simple example).
>
> A closure is simply a chunk of code that "remembers" the context that
> it originally appeared in. This is unusual, because in conventional
> block-structured languages, once something goes out of scope it is
> lost.
Dave has already explained closure nicely, so I'll show a pitfall.
As Dave stated, a closure remembers the context that a chunk of code
"originally" appeared in.
a = 1
obj = Proc.new {
print "scope B: ", a, "\n"
}
print "scope A: ", a, "\n"
obj.call
a = 20
obj.call
$ ruby proc.rb
scope A: 1
scope B: 1
scope B: 20
The code above showed that Proc'ed block remebered 'original' context,
rather than remembering the value of 'a' at the block which is 1.
In the above example the scope of the variable 'a' is in toplevel,
therefore it's not out of scope after the block. If it's out of
scope, assign to variable 'a' doesn't, of cause, affect.
def foo(a)
proc { print "scope B: ", a, "\n" }
end
obj = foo(1)
obj.call
a = 20 # first appearance of 'a' in this scope
obj.call # so it doesn't affect variable 'a' in the block
$ ruby proc_out.rb
scope B: 1
scope B: 1
hope this helps,
--
yashi