[#4766] Wiki — "Glen Stampoultzis" <trinexus@...>

21 messages 2000/09/04
[#4768] RE: Wiki — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2000/09/04

Hi, Glen,

[#4783] Re: Wiki — Masatoshi SEKI <m_seki@...> 2000/09/04

[#4785] Re: Wiki — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2000/09/05

Howdy,

[#4883] Re-binding a block — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

16 messages 2000/09/12

[#4930] Perl 6 rumblings -- RFC 225 (v1) Data: Superpositions — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>

Hi,

11 messages 2000/09/15

[#4936] Ruby Book Eng. translation editor's questions — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

20 messages 2000/09/16

[#5045] Proposal: Add constants to Math — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

15 messages 2000/09/21

[#5077] Crazy idea? infix method calls — hal9000@...

This is a generalization of the "in" operator idea which I

17 messages 2000/09/22

[#5157] Compile Problem with 1.6.1 — Scott Billings <aerogems@...>

When I try to compile Ruby 1.6.1, I get the following error:

15 messages 2000/09/27

[ruby-talk:4780] Re: unix 'time' in Ruby?

From: Robert Feldt <feldt@...>
Date: 2000-09-04 13:01:53 UTC
List: ruby-talk #4780
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:

> matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
> 
> > Time#times is an only exception in Time methods.
> 
> I've been thinking about this: should #times migrate across to
> Process? It would seem like a more natural home for it?
> 
The first thing I though when needing unix-like time was to go check in
Process after thinking that Times only deals with real, "calendar" time
and I need "times" related to the process...

So my answer to your questions would be: Yes! and Yes! :-)

Regards,

Robert


In This Thread