[#4766] Wiki — "Glen Stampoultzis" <trinexus@...>

21 messages 2000/09/04
[#4768] RE: Wiki — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2000/09/04

Hi, Glen,

[#4783] Re: Wiki — Masatoshi SEKI <m_seki@...> 2000/09/04

[#4785] Re: Wiki — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2000/09/05

Howdy,

[#4883] Re-binding a block — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

16 messages 2000/09/12

[#4930] Perl 6 rumblings -- RFC 225 (v1) Data: Superpositions — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>

Hi,

11 messages 2000/09/15

[#4936] Ruby Book Eng. translation editor's questions — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

20 messages 2000/09/16

[#5045] Proposal: Add constants to Math — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

15 messages 2000/09/21

[#5077] Crazy idea? infix method calls — hal9000@...

This is a generalization of the "in" operator idea which I

17 messages 2000/09/22

[#5157] Compile Problem with 1.6.1 — Scott Billings <aerogems@...>

When I try to compile Ruby 1.6.1, I get the following error:

15 messages 2000/09/27

[ruby-talk:4952] Re: Perl 6 rumblings -- RFC 225 (v1) Data: Superpositions

From: Mark Slagell <ms@...>
Date: 2000-09-17 02:50:55 UTC
List: ruby-talk #4952
Dave Thomas wrote:
> 
> Mark Slagell <ms@iastate.edu> writes:
> 
> > Ok. But "none?" should alias "!any?" instead of "!all?", I think ... :-)
> 
> details, details ;-)
> 
> How about 'some?'
> 
> Dave

Or "sufficient?" -- talk about DWIM!  But, kidding aside, "any?", "all?"
and "count" all make plenty of sense to me.

btw, my apologies to everybody for the wonky margins earlier.  Netscape
does that to my outgoing mail every once in a great while, and I'm not
sure why.  Maybe if I turn off "enough?" features it will behave more
reliably. :-)

  Mark

In This Thread