[#4766] Wiki — "Glen Stampoultzis" <trinexus@...>

21 messages 2000/09/04
[#4768] RE: Wiki — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2000/09/04

Hi, Glen,

[#4783] Re: Wiki — Masatoshi SEKI <m_seki@...> 2000/09/04

[#4785] Re: Wiki — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2000/09/05

Howdy,

[#4883] Re-binding a block — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

16 messages 2000/09/12

[#4930] Perl 6 rumblings -- RFC 225 (v1) Data: Superpositions — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>

Hi,

11 messages 2000/09/15

[#4936] Ruby Book Eng. translation editor's questions — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

20 messages 2000/09/16

[#5045] Proposal: Add constants to Math — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

15 messages 2000/09/21

[#5077] Crazy idea? infix method calls — hal9000@...

This is a generalization of the "in" operator idea which I

17 messages 2000/09/22

[#5157] Compile Problem with 1.6.1 — Scott Billings <aerogems@...>

When I try to compile Ruby 1.6.1, I get the following error:

15 messages 2000/09/27

[ruby-talk:5105] Re: binding weirdness

From: ts <decoux@...>
Date: 2000-09-25 16:25:58 UTC
List: ruby-talk #5105
>>>>> "B" == Brian F Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org> writes:

B> It makes things weirder than before :-(  It fixes the case I presented, but 
B> it make ruby give an awful lot of warnings about already initialized 
B> constants and act pretty strange in general.  Thanks for the attempt at 
B> fixing it, but it isn't working.  Perhaps the inserted rb_clear_cache_by_id 
B> must occur before the st_insert?

 Apparently this is this patch which give the warnings :

@@ -5042,4 +5038,4 @@
        }
-       len = strlen(feature);
-       if (strncmp(f, feature, len) == 0) {
+       len = strlen(f);
+       if (strncmp(f, feature, strlen(feature)) == 0) {
            if (strcmp(f+len, ".so") == 0) {

 try with and without it


Guy Decoux




In This Thread

Prev Next