[ruby-talk:5122] Re: Types and ===

----- Original Message -----
From: Yasushi Shoji <[e-mail]>
To: ruby-talk ML <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 7:25 PM
Subject: [ruby-talk:5120] Re: Types and ===


> '===' does not imply '==' at all.  '===' is defined in each class the
> way to make writing case statement easier.  most classes use '==' for
> '===', but some class, such as class Class and class Range uses
> other.is_a?(self) and self.include?(other), respectively.
>

Yes... I guess one root of my difficulty is that I have chosen to understand
Ruby's case statement in terms of the switch statement in C/C++ or the
case statement in Pascal (among others).

But now I think that Ruby's case statement is not really like any other
multiway branch I have seen in any other language.

> > Actually I have trouble remembering what === means --
> > whether to say x === y or y === x, which are of course
> > not the same.
>
> so, i guess you don't have to remember what '===' at all ;)
>
> I think the moment you need to remember about '===' is when you write
> your own class.  you can define '===' in your own class to control
> case statement.

Yes, I guess that is true... but I do like to have a thorough understanding.

But sometimes I struggle with the case statement because of the lack of
commutativity or symmetry. (Probably there are good reasons === is not
symmetrical. I have not thought about it much.)

For example, if I want to ask, "Which pattern does this string match?" I can
easily do something like:

case mystring
  when /pat1/
     stmt1
  when /pat2/
      stmt
  ...
end

But to ask the question, "Which of these strings matches this pattern?" I
cannot
do this:

case /pattern/
  when str1
      stmt1
  when str2
      stmt2
  ...
end

Hal