[#4766] Wiki — "Glen Stampoultzis" <trinexus@...>

21 messages 2000/09/04
[#4768] RE: Wiki — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2000/09/04

Hi, Glen,

[#4783] Re: Wiki — Masatoshi SEKI <m_seki@...> 2000/09/04

[#4785] Re: Wiki — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2000/09/05

Howdy,

[#4883] Re-binding a block — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

16 messages 2000/09/12

[#4930] Perl 6 rumblings -- RFC 225 (v1) Data: Superpositions — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>

Hi,

11 messages 2000/09/15

[#4936] Ruby Book Eng. translation editor's questions — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

20 messages 2000/09/16

[#5045] Proposal: Add constants to Math — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

15 messages 2000/09/21

[#5077] Crazy idea? infix method calls — hal9000@...

This is a generalization of the "in" operator idea which I

17 messages 2000/09/22

[#5157] Compile Problem with 1.6.1 — Scott Billings <aerogems@...>

When I try to compile Ruby 1.6.1, I get the following error:

15 messages 2000/09/27

[ruby-talk:5060] Re: GC patch

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2000-09-22 07:26:55 UTC
List: ruby-talk #5060
Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:5058] Re: GC patch"
    on 00/09/22, Mathieu Bouchard <matju@cam.org> writes:

|I wrote a patch to Ruby 1.6.0pre2's gc.c that makes gc frequency inversely
|proportional to the number of currently allocated objects, so that % of
|time spent on GC remains about the same. With Aleksi's program (see
|message #4407) I get the following results. My version of the GC uses
|about 20% more RAM, but one can fumble with the linear equations for more
|conservative RAM usage if wanted.

Thank you for the proposal.  Could you supply us unified diff, or at
worst context diff, so that we can confirm the fix before applying it?

							matz.

In This Thread

Prev Next