[#4766] Wiki — "Glen Stampoultzis" <trinexus@...>

21 messages 2000/09/04
[#4768] RE: Wiki — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2000/09/04

Hi, Glen,

[#4783] Re: Wiki — Masatoshi SEKI <m_seki@...> 2000/09/04

[#4785] Re: Wiki — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2000/09/05

Howdy,

[#4883] Re-binding a block — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

16 messages 2000/09/12

[#4930] Perl 6 rumblings -- RFC 225 (v1) Data: Superpositions — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>

Hi,

11 messages 2000/09/15

[#4936] Ruby Book Eng. translation editor's questions — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

20 messages 2000/09/16

[#5045] Proposal: Add constants to Math — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

15 messages 2000/09/21

[#5077] Crazy idea? infix method calls — hal9000@...

This is a generalization of the "in" operator idea which I

17 messages 2000/09/22

[#5157] Compile Problem with 1.6.1 — Scott Billings <aerogems@...>

When I try to compile Ruby 1.6.1, I get the following error:

15 messages 2000/09/27

[ruby-talk:4749] Re: RubyUnit testcase run for different init params?

From: Masaki Suketa <CQN02273@...>
Date: 2000-09-02 14:11:24 UTC
List: ruby-talk #4749
Hello,

In message "[ruby-talk:4660] Re: RubyUnit testcase run for different init params?"
    on 00/08/30, Robert Feldt <feldt@ce.chalmers.se> writes:

> Comments? Do you think this is so specific I should override RubyUnit
> myself? Other ways to do it, Masaki?

OK, I'll merge your patch. Thank you. But now, the other way comes 
my mind.

If the format of the element of $@ is not like:

  filename:line:in `methodname'

but like:

  filename:line:in `classname#methodname'

then we do not need the insert_class_name method.

How about this format, matz? 
I think this format is usefull not only when using RubyUnit 
but in any other situations.

Anyway this format is usefull for RubyUnit, so I merge the 
patch of [ruby-talk:4662] now.

  Thank you.
  Masaki Suketa <CQN02273@nifty.ne.jp>

In This Thread