[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,

[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25

[ruby-talk:01639] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2000-02-29 04:55:37 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1639
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to comp.lang.misc as well.

Dave Thomas <Dave@Thomases.com> writes:

|Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@netlab.co.jp> writes:
|
|> In fact Ruby called `initialize' for these classes before, just like
|> you proposed. In these days I received several complains like:
|> `initialize' would not work as I expect, it requires fixed number of
|> arguments, etc.
|
|I guess you just can't win ;-)

Coordination is the main task of a language designer. (sigh)

|So, as of 1.5.2.x, is it just Array that has this property? (I seem to
|remember you saying that you'd changed File etc.)

Not yet.  Do you want to see?  I'll commit today.

							matz.

In This Thread