[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,

[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25

[ruby-talk:01290] Re: Bug in doc for atan2?

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2000-02-10 02:45:51 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1290
Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:01288] Bug in doc for atan2?"
    on 00/02/09, Andrew Hunt <Andy@Toolshed.Com> writes:

|The source for Math.atan2 documents its parameters as (x, y), as does
|the Japanese Ruby book (pg 504).  However, the atan2 function takes
|its arguments as (y, x) according to the Unix man pages and the Java
|documentation (which is based netlib's math library).
|
|I'm assuming it should be atan2(y,x), right?

Right, it was documentation bug.

In This Thread

Prev Next