[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,

[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25

[ruby-talk:01644] Re: New Ruby projects

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2000-02-29 07:14:10 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1644
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to comp.lang.misc as well.

"Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net> writes:

|looking into it for good ideas prior to doing a Ruby version. (I don't know
|it there would be any problems with the C++ implementation of wxwindows
|versus what I think is Ruby's primarily C interface support. I haven't
|looked into either one. I'm sure the Pragmatic Duo could surmount any
|problems here, if there are any.)

FYI, making Ruby extension for C++ library is no pain, provided you
wrap them around by extern "C" { } stuff, just like extension
for other languages.

							matz.

In This Thread

Prev Next