[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,

[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25

[ruby-talk:01523] Re: Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!!

From: Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...>
Date: 2000-02-19 23:17:02 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1523
From: "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net>
Subject: [ruby-talk:01516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!!
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 14:21:56 -0600

> I think it is best to post ONLY to the comp.lang.misc, because I've noticed
> that people are still responding to the mail list rather than to
> comp.lang.misc. I think it would be better if the only response (if any)
> sent to the Ruby mail list is "Please see comp.lang.misc for my response".

I'm sorry.  I prefer using Mailing list, instead.  I don't care if the
list gets newsgroup gateway like mozilla mailing list <->
netscape.public.*, but just don't kill this list and move to usenet.

regards,
--
            yashi

In This Thread