[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,

[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25

[ruby-talk:01540] Re: RFD: comp.lang.ruby

From: "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
Date: 2000-02-23 01:52:35 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1540
Can someone from the ruby-talk ML <ruby-talk@netlab.co.jp> respond to the
newsgroup news.groups about this? (This thread derives from an earlier
question about fj.lang.ruby.)

Brian Edmonds <bedmonds@cs.ubc.ca> wrote in message
news:37ya8eta39.fsf@ryoko.cs.ubc.ca...
> Jay Denebeim <denebeim@deepthot.aurora.co.us> writes:
> > Either, they're both japaneese hierarchies.  (and no, I don't know the
> > japaneese word for japaneese, presumably that's where the fj comes
> > from)
>
> As Jon pointed out, fj is short for "from Japan".  I think the idea is
> that fj.* is for international discussion in Japanese, whereas jp.* is
> the Japanese regional hierarchy.  But I could be wrong on that.  Hmm, is
> there a jp.*?  We've got japan.* on our transit server, but no jp.*.
>
> In any case, Nihongo is Japanese for Japanese.  I won't try to reproduce
> the kanji here. :)
>
> Brian.



In This Thread

Prev Next