[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,

[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25

[ruby-talk:01343] Say Hi

From: mengx@...
Date: 2000-02-14 22:08:00 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1343
Hi:

I Studied Ruby's document and coding for about two days and decided
to start using Ruby even though I have used Python for 5 years, among other
languages. In my opinion, Ruby is what Python 3000 should be if
all these $$$$ can be removed :-) (for some reason, I never like
$$$$ so I chose Python (also due to neat syntax) over Perl).
Ruby is ultimate dynamic language.

Just a quick thought after going through Array class, would it
be possible to revise the pop and push method to accept index argument

such that pop(0) act like shift and pop(-1) like current pop
push (obj, 0) like unshift and push(obj, -1) like current push.
shift and unshift are too Perlitical :-). I know I can subclass it, 
but having it builtin would be better.

Thanks 

-Ted Meng

In This Thread

Prev Next