[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,

[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25

[ruby-talk:01595] Re: Race condition in Singleton

From: gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
Date: 2000-02-27 08:32:31 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1595
Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:01594] Re: Race condition in Singleton"
    on 00/02/27, Minero Aoki <aamine@dp.u-netsurf.ne.jp> writes:
>If instance() takes arguments, only first arguments are used and
>rest are simply discarded. It is not user's aim, isn't it?

I thinks so. By the way, if one would write a generator which returns
a unique object for an argument, she can use Flyweightfactory in
[ruby-talk:01530].

And, I also agree the first point at Dave's [ruby-talk:01592];
`unless @__instance__' should be included in the critical session. 

-- gotoken

In This Thread