[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,

[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25

[ruby-talk:01368] Re: nice sample for functional stuff

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
Date: 2000-02-15 05:27:19 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1368
gotoken@math.sci.hokudai.ac.jp (GOTO Kentaro) writes:

> That is not bad though, I was interested in how I can sum up the
> non-numerical elements.  The solution above uses an assumption such
> that the result is 0 if enum.size == 0 but [ruby-talk:01364] doesn't.
> 
> # And, I wanted simply to use `callcc' then ;-)

Both are excellent points! Although you can always use the raw .inject 
method to overcome the first objection:

       p ['foo', 'bar', 'baz'].inject("") {|n,i| n += i}
       p [].inject("all gone")  {|n,i| n += i}

But yours is certainly a more interesting solution.

Thanks!


Dave

In This Thread