[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,

[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25

[ruby-talk:01414] Re: Bignum aset

From: Andrew Hunt <andy@...>
Date: 2000-02-16 02:33:59 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1414
    >Or.. how about a class BitSet that had proper bit operators ([]=, plus 
    >all the shifts, xors, and the like) that could be converted back and
    >forth between itself and Integer. That way, you'd have the bit class
    >for bit semantics, but which made no promises about arithmetic, but
    >which could morph into a Fixnum or Bignum as appropriate.

Sounds good to me.  If you're twidding bits, you aren't likely
to want to suddenly add 42 to the number.

/\ndy

In This Thread

Prev Next