[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,

[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25

[ruby-talk:01443] 1680 "Conrad Schneiker" RFD: unmoderated group comp.lang.ruby

From: "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
Date: 2000-02-16 10:56:08 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1443
(Ruby-talk ML: FYI: Sent to group-advice @ isc.org by schneiker @ jump.net.)


Hi,

For several days now, this entry,

    1680 "Conrad Schneiker" RFD: unmoderated group comp.lang.ruby

has been shown under the  daily item titled:

   "UVV: Daily RFD, PQ, and CFV status report ...",

which is posted in news.groups.

Being new to this process, I was wondering if this is normal, if there was
some unresolved problem with the submission, or if there is something that
is waiting on me that I was not aware of or that I had somehow missed
notification of.

Thanks,
Conrad

In This Thread

Prev Next