[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,

[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25

[ruby-talk:01233] Singleton classes

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
Date: 2000-02-05 02:12:44 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1233
I just _know_ this is going to get me in trouble, but...

We currently document this construct:

  class << obj
     ..
  end

as a 'singleton class'. There's some logic to the name, but I was
wondering... would 'anonymous class' be more understandable?

After all, what you're doing is creating a new, unnamed class, based on
obj's class. Yes, there's only one of them (initially), so it _is_ a
singleton, but I personally find the terminology obscure.

As we're just starting to get some momentum going on getting a lot
more English-language Ruby documentation out (more news later), now is
a good time to have a look at the notation and see if we can find
areas where terms could be made clearer.

What do people think? And are there other phrases and concepts that
people would like to discuss?


Regards


Dave

In This Thread

Prev Next