[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,

[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25

[ruby-talk:01572] Re: Complex numbers, etc.

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
Date: 2000-02-25 04:47:47 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1572
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to comp.lang.misc as well.

h.fulton@att.net writes:

> Thank you, matz. I will do one or the other.
> Let me investigate first.
> > 
> > In message "[ruby-talk:01542] Complex numbers, etc."
> >     on 00/02/23, h.fulton@att.net <h.fulton@att.net> writes:
> > 
> > |I am wondering if anyone has an idea for a problem of
> > |a similar nature that I could work on? By "similar
> > |nature" I mean relatively self-contained, easily grokked
> > |in its entirety, but not entirely trivial or useless.
> > 
> > How about strptime(3) like date parsing function, or better parsedate.
> > lib/parsedate.rb is done by me, but is pretty ad hoc and ugly.

V1.8 of the date2 package includes an strptime parser (along with a
replacement parsedate).

Dave

In This Thread

Prev Next