[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,

[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25

[ruby-talk:01565] Re: Ruby supported/distributed libraries--can all be used together?

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2000-02-24 14:04:30 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1565
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to comp.lang.misc as well.


"Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net> writes:

|What problems would presently (or indefinitely) exist for doing the
|following?

(snip)

Like undump for Emacs, TeX, and Perl?

If there's portable way to do so, I'd like to know how.
Bundling everything in one huge binary is sometimes useful.

							matz.

In This Thread

Prev Next