[#1215] Tk widget demo; English Tk docs?; Java 1.2 Swing — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
Hi,
[#1218] Trivial FAQ bug — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#1229] A vote for old behavior — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#1232] Any FAQ requests, updates, ... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#1233] Singleton classes — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#1307] Ruby/GTK 0.23 released — Hiroshi IGARASHI <igarashi@...>
Hi all,
From: Hiroshi IGARASHI <igarashi@ueda.info.waseda.ac.jp>
From: "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net>
On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 09:37:27PM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:
[#1322] FAQ: Ruby acronyms — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
In the spirit of TABWTDI (there are better ways to do it), I'd like to
[#1341] Vim syntax file — Mirko Nasato <mirko.nasato@...>
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 05:44:39PM +0100, Mirko Nasato wrote:
[#1354] Say hi (bis) — Pixel <pixel_@...>
hi all,
[#1355] nice sample for functional stuff — Pixel <pixel_@...>
what about having map in standard (and map_index too)?
[#1373] Ruby Language Reference Manual--Glossary — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
I was going to print the Ruby Language Reference Manual when I noticed that
[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>
Conrad writes:
[#1379] Re: Yield — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>
>From: "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net>
[#1384] Re: Say Hi — mengx@...
My suggestion was to try to find a more comfortable method name (to me, and
[#1392] Re: Some Questions - Parameterised Types / Invariants — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>
>1. Parameterised Types / Template Classes
[#1398] Bignum aset — Andrew Hunt <Andy@...>
[#1488] Discussion happens on news.groups — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>
Hello Ian,
On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:
[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))
From: "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net>
[#1528] ruby <=> python — Quinn Dunkan <quinn@...>
Hello! I'm new to ruby-talk, and mostly new to ruby. I'm making a document
[#1551] Ruby thread scheduling buglet — Ian Main <imain@...>
[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
[#1591] Certain char's not recognized by "." in regex? — Wes Nakamura <wknaka@...>
[#1592] Race condition in Singleton — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[ruby-talk:01555] Re: rdtool documentation for library modules
Hi,
In message "[ruby-talk:01554] Re: rdtool documentation for library modules"
on 00/02/23, Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> writes:
>The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
>that has been posted to comp.lang.misc as well.
>
>Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@yb3.so-net.ne.jp> writes:
>
>> Sorry I don't know about NetNews well, so I post this to this ruby-talk
>> instead of comp.lang.misc.
>
>And I appreciate it ;-)
thanks.
>> I'll show you what RD has changed last month.
>>
>> * MethodList, new RDElement which is special type of DescList for Method
>> of Ruby(and other languages).
>
>This all looks great.
>
>You say that TempFile is obsolete. Is that just the method list, or
>are the headings themselves wrong?
Just because not using MethodList. AFAIK, content of tempfile.rd is
correct. (but, I think, my poor English should be corrected.;-p)
>> >The reason I ask is that right now I'm documenting the library modules
>> >for the book. If people want, I could transfer this same documentation
>> >to the actual library source files in rd format, killing two birds
>> >with one stone. If that sounds like a good idea, I just need to know
>> >what format to use.
>>
>> If you try to use RD for it, we will understand what isn't enough for RD.
>> I'll welcome it very much. :-)
>
>Well, we're typesetting the book using LaTeX, and we have a large
>number of special macros (that do things such as insert live output
>from Ruby code fragments into the text), so we won't be able to write
>the book itself using rdtool. However, I was thinking that as I have
>already got the documentation written, a Ruby script to convert it
>from LaTeX ino rdtool shouldn't be too difficult. Then I can insert
>the result into each library file.
>
>Does this sound like a useful thing to do?
Yes, I see.
Providing both book documents and on-line documents might be good
idea, I think. I like old book style document, but I also want
on-line documents to refer it while I am writing a program! :-)
---
Tosh
Toshiro Kuwabara