From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) Date: 2000-02-02T18:06:19+09:00 Subject: [ruby-talk:01221] Re: Trivial FAQ bug In message "[ruby-talk:01219] Re: Trivial FAQ bug" on 00/02/01, "Conrad Schneiker" writes: |For instance, besides noting that Ruby doesn't treat "" as false like Perl |does, is there a good language design or programming practice reason for |this? Being new to Ruby and not being familiar with the reasons for such |things, it seems to me that Perl's treatment of "" in conditions is somewhat |less error-prone and somewhat better follows the principle of least |surprise. Mostly for performance reason, currently false test is done by one bitwise operation. If "" etc. made false, false test would be far more complex. |Since I am still learning Ruby, I thought it would be useful learning |exercise to do a "Ruby Cookbook" FAQ for Perl programmers (an idea I got |from a recent suggestion in the Python newsgroup to in effect translate the |Perl Cookbook into Python). Any interest in this? I'd like to see a Ruby Cookbook. Of cource, I'll help to make one. | One of the first things I |would like to include would be examples of Ruby equivalents for Perl's map |and grep functions, which I make heavy use of. Enumerable's collect and select replace Perl's map/grep. e.g. [1,2,3,4].collect{|x| x*2} #=> [2,4,6,8] [1,2,3,4].select{|x| x % 2 == 0} #=> [2,4] matz.