[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,

[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25

[ruby-talk:01337] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ

From: "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
Date: 2000-02-14 04:34:12 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1337
From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@netlab.co.jp>

> In message "[ruby-talk:01335] Re: Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ"
>     on 00/02/13, "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net> writes:
>
> |Looks to me like it already has been provisionally blessed and officially
> |released (i.e. "new better FAQ is available" link on www.ruby-lang.org
home
> |page), although I can appreciate your concerns.
>
> Well, I linked it without Dave's permission.  Maybe it was too rush.

I think the new FAQ is such a big improvement (although the original FAQ was
a pretty good start) that I think that linking the new FAQ was a good thing
to do, especially with the recent publicity.

Conrad

In This Thread