[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,

[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25

[ruby-talk:01378] Re: nice sample for functional stuff

From: Pixel <pixel_@...>
Date: 2000-02-15 12:37:57 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1378
gotoken@math.sci.hokudai.ac.jp (GOTO Kentaro) writes:

[...]

> >       def sum
> >         inject(0) {|n, i| n += i }
                                ^^ why ??

        inject(0) {|n, i| n + i }

seems enough to me, uh?

> >       end
> >     end
> 
> That is not bad though, I was interested in how I can sum up the
> non-numerical elements.  The solution above uses an assumption such
> that the result is 0 if enum.size == 0

and also that each element are numbers, otherwise you need

def sum
  inject(0) {|n, i| n + i.to_i }
end

but doesn't help much


> but [ruby-talk:01364] doesn't.

uh? your solution gives ([].sum == nil), tis still not the best. mine has the
same problem

l = [1]
l.sum + 1 #=> 2

l.shift
l.sum + 1 #=> Exception

-> [].sum should raise an exception

(perl has no such problem as "" is 0 is undef is ... :)

In This Thread