[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,

[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25

[ruby-talk:01482] Re: yield vs. callback vs. callBlock etc.

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2000-02-18 01:50:42 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1482
Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:01478] yield vs. callback vs. callBlock etc."
    on 00/02/17, Huayin Wang <wang@rjka.com> writes:

|I prefer to keep "yield", I always understand it as means "yield control to ...",
|and it is what it really is.
|
|I also think that consistency and backward compatibility is very important, 
|and it will be more important as ruby mature.  

I'm not going to remove any keyword from Ruby.
Some may be added in the future, though.

|..... although no one is asking my opinion :P

Your opinion is always welcome.

							matz.

In This Thread

Prev Next