[#1263] Draft of the updated Ruby FAQ — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

33 messages 2000/02/08

[#1376] Re: Scripting versus programming — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Conrad writes:

13 messages 2000/02/15

[#1508] Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...>

17 messages 2000/02/19
[#1544] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/02/23

Hello Ian,

[#1550] Re: Ruby/GTK and the mainloop — Ian Main <imain@...> 2000/02/23

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:56:10AM -0500, Yasushi Shoji wrote:

[#1516] Ruby: PLEASE use comp.lang.misc for all Ruby programming/technical questions/discussions!!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>

((FYI: This was sent to the Ruby mail list.))

10 messages 2000/02/19

[#1569] Re: Ruby: constructors, new and initialise — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article

12 messages 2000/02/25

[ruby-talk:01543] Re: Complex numbers, etc.

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2000-02-23 07:45:23 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1543
Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:01542] Complex numbers, etc."
    on 00/02/23, h.fulton@att.net <h.fulton@att.net> writes:

|I am wondering if anyone has an idea for a problem of
|a similar nature that I could work on? By "similar
|nature" I mean relatively self-contained, easily grokked
|in its entirety, but not entirely trivial or useless.

How about strptime(3) like date parsing function, or better parsedate.
lib/parsedate.rb is done by me, but is pretty ad hoc and ugly.

In This Thread